RACHEL ALEXANDER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Michelle Malkin said about what happened to Rachel Alexander:
"Make no mistake: This is just another nasty battle in the Left’s long war to marginalize, demonize, and criminalize conservative dissent. The selective protection of free speech is unconscionable. The freedom to blog is under assault on so many fronts. It has to stop."
This legal defense fund was started due to friends shocked at what happened to Rachel Alexander, a conservative attorney, writer and former editor of a gun magazine - simply because she is a well-spoken conservative attorney who writes political articles and briefly represented Sheriff Joe Arpaio as one of his attorneys in 2010.
This could happen to any of us on the right. State Bar associations and the judiciary are almost monolithically controlled by the left, as many of you know, even in red states like Arizona where Rachel lives. The legal system was abused to terrorize her and destroy her life, in one of the most egregious witch hunts ever. She is now in her seventh year of being targeted with no end in sight to the legal costs and defamatory media articles. The corrupt county government will not pay for an attorney, so she must come up with the money herself and has been forced to represent herself much of the way, even though the actions they accused her of were taken in her official capacity working for the Maricopa County Attorney. Rachel could have caved in and ran, but she’s not stopping until the corruption is cleaned out of Maricopa County, the Arizona State Bar and judiciary.
Although her license to practice law was supposed to be automatically reinstated after an unfair six month suspension – it has now been over two years – the Arizona State Bar will not reinstate her.
Please read her story, spread the word or donate whatever you can. Her friends would like to raise enough money to cover her legal costs. Rachel has started using her writing for Townhall, The Stream and other well-read publications to expose the horrendous abuses against conservatives - both lawyers and nonlawyers - around the country through misuing the legal system: Dinesh D’Souza, Rick Perry, Bob McDonnell, Tom DeLay, Ted Stevens, Sheriff Arpaio, Rick Renzi, Texas DA Charles Sebesta and conservative bloggers to name a few. Let's keep that ball rolling!
Rachel's expenses so far
Rachel has attempted to represent herself much of the way, since the Maricopa County Supervisors have not authorized an attorney since 2012. However, the system is so rigged she has had no success, and so has been forced to hire two attorneys to fight back. Although her license to practice law was supposed to be automatically reinstated after an unfair six month suspension - it has now been almost two years - the Arizona State Bar will not reinstate her. She has hired one attorney to represent her in dealing with the Bar. Since the county supervisors will not pay for the cost of prosecuting her, she has another attorney who has filed a lawsuit against them, who is representing her on a contingency fee, but she still must come up with the costs and that attorney is retiring and dropping the case.
Here is how much she's spent in recent months and what she will need for depositions in the discovery stage. We'd like to raise this much, and if there are further costs, those too, as well as hourly costs for an attorney since she cannot find anyone to replace her on a contingency fee.
Retainer for representation in Bar reinstatement: $5,000
Hourly costs and fees so far in Bar reinstatement: $2,146
Filing fee and service of process in lawsuit against supervisors: $352.50
What happened to Rachel could happen to any of us. Rachel supported her husband's four teenagers (no child support) for much of the past six years, and the stress finally destroyed her marriage. She has over $65,000 in student loans she cannot make payments on currently. She had been making payments of $700/mth on her student loans and would have paid them all off by 2013 if this hadn’t destroyed her finances, reputation and ability to make a living. She lost her home to foreclosure in 2012. We will keep this page updated with news of Rachel’s fight to get her bar license back, other articles she writes about conservatives targeted through the legal system, and her lawsuits.
Please contribute, even a small amount from many people goes a long way, and spread the word!
Read more about Rachel's case
Michelle Malkin: Bloggers under fire: Arizona conservative lawyer/activist targeted by left-wing Arizona State Bar
John Hawkins: Liberal State Bar Spends Three Years Going After Lawyer For Being Conservative Blogger
John Hawkins: Is The State Bar of Arizona Targeting Conservatives For Blogging And Fighting Illegal Immigration?
Andrew Thomas explains the story of how the State Bar and judiciary came after him, Alexander and Aubuchon
Arizona Republic: Arizona Republican Party denounces ethics investigation of Alexander, Thomas and Aubuchon
Prominent Arizona blogger espressopundit denounces ethics investigation of Alexander
Prominent attorneys - including a Democrat - take out full-page ad in Arizona Bar magazine denouncing investigation of Alexander, Thomas and Aubuchon
Video interview with Lisa Aubuchon explaining what happened her, Alexander and Thomas
What Andrew Thomas attempted to prosecute Maricopa County Supervisor Don Stapley for (contrast this with what happened to Jesse Jackson, Mr., for doing the same exact thing)
Former Congressman and prosecutor Bob Barr's legal opinion: State Bar proceedings were illegally initiated
Bob Barr legal opinion: State Bar president illegally prohibited Democrat and former State Bar president from representing Andrew Thomas in Bar proceedings
Bob Barr legal opinion: There is no written complaint by the State Bar against Andrew Thomas, others
Arizona Bar disciplinary judge has ethics issues
Overreaching interrogatories served by AZ State Bar on Alexander demanding to know everything she had ever blogged over 5 years
Digital Journal author Chris Wager: Maricopa County, AZ Seat to Unprecedented Judicial Corruption
Arizona blogger David Roney: Charges Against Rachel Alexander Are Bogus & Embarrass Arizona Legal Community
Arizona blogger Barbara Espinosa: Conservative Writer Rachel Alexander, Prosecution is Grossly Overreached by Arizona State Bar Judiciary Panel
Author Selwyn Duke: Political persecution in Maricopa County
Rachel Alexander is one of the most outspoken conservatives today. She started intellectualconservative.com in 2002, then progressed to writing for websites like townhall.com, christianpost.com and rightwingnews.com. Even left-wing sites like the UK Guardian reached out to her and offered her paid writing gigs. She is now a senior editor and writer with The Stream.
In 2005, she was offered a job in Arizona as a deputy county attorney and adviser to newly elected Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, a conservative activist. She accepted the position, and continued to expand her writing and websites, starting IC Arizona, a subsidiary of her main website, where she would post press releases from Thomas.
She wrote many groundbreaking articles while working for Thomas, including one for Fox News that explained why the prosecutor’s office was attempting to prosecute someone for child pornography (she has a background in tech), and another article exposing the unfair, race-based DUI courts that the Arizona Superior Court in Maricopa County had set up.
She was awarded the Right Online (Americans for Prosperity) activist of the year award in 2009 for her efforts. From 2011-2015, Right Wing News has ranked her among the top 50 conservative columnists in the country.
But ironically, at the same time, for her courageousness in exposing left-wing abuses, she began to be viciously targeted in 2009 by the left, from both the Arizona State Bar and the left-leaning Arizona judiciary. Conservative commentator Michelle Malkin has written the most comprehensive summary of what happened to Rachel here.
It is astounding in so many ways, where to start to explain it all? Rachel’s former boss, Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, along with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, attempted to prosecute corrupt county supervisors and complicit judges (the supervisors controlled the judges’ budgets so they were untouchable – oops!), for things like spending campaign money on thousands upon thousands of dollars on luxury personal items. Rachel had a very minor role in it all; her name was briefly put on a racketeering (RICO) complaint AFTER it had been filed, and almost none of her research was included on anything that was filed. She was briefly assigned to only that one complaint, as a lesser attorney, supervised under the “RICO” expert in the office. The complaint was withdrawn two and half months later, so nothing ever happened. But based on this, powerful left-wing attorneys connected to the county supervisors and judges who control the State Bar came after her too along with her boss and one of his senior prosecutors. Notably, they did not come after her immediate supervisor, the apolitical RICO expert who had a much larger role in the RICO complaint, drafting and finalizing some of the pleadings, unlike her.
At one point, the Bar prosecutors demanded to know everything she had ever written online — including anonymously — in the last five years, a gross violation of free speech. Halfway through the bar trial against her – which was livestreamed for over two months for everyone to see, at a cost of over $500,000 for everything including bringing in pricey attorneys from out of state – the Bar’s attorneys realized how weak their case was against her, and offered her settlements. At first, they offered her two years probation. She refused, based on principle, since she hadn’t done anything wrong. Then, they offered her one year of probation. She refused again. Finally, when the trial was almost over, and they realized how ridiculous their case was, they offered her a settlement of just taking a few extra continuing legal education courses. Again, she refused based on principle – she had done nothing wrong. Many people would have caved at this point. Not Rachel. She is sticking it out to the bitter end, in order to make sure this kind of abuse can’t happen to others, and will do what she can to make it happen, which includes converting the Bar to a voluntary association, as it is in about half the states. She is working on bills in the Arizona legislature to accomplish this.
With a complicit State Bar disciplinary judge, who was reportedly put in the position since he would do the bidding of the State Bar – who has his own history of corruption – they disbarred Rachel’s former boss, one of his lead prosecutors, and suspended Rachel from practicing law for six months.
The corrupt Maricopa County Supervisors quit paying for her defense, and so she was forced to appeal her suspension to the Arizona Supreme Court pro se, spending hours researching and writing a 30+ page appeal herself. She was able to get her sentence reduced slightly in the appeal, but not by much. She would have appealed again to the U.S. Supreme Court, but by then had come down with several health problems related to stress, including a hernia and gallbladder surgery. She was supposed to be automatically readmitted after six months, but the Arizona State Bar continues to do everything it can to keep her from being readmitted. They will not readmit her unless she pays $101,500 for prosecuting her AND her boss and his chief prosecutor! This is no joke. She is being held liable for the actions of her superiors!
It has now been four years, and this corrupt cabal continues to do everything it can to keep Rachel from clearing her name and getting her license reinstated. It has cost her over $7,000 and counting for out of pocket expenses to attorneys to try and fight it.
This is unheard of in the case of a deputy county prosecutor – even a former risk management chief for the county has privately admitted that it’s unheard of for a deputy county attorney not to get their bar disciplinary costs reimbursed. Rachel is suing the county supervisors to recover this cost – she fortunately found an attorney who is so incensed by the injustice that he is representing her on contingency fee, requiring costs only – but the supervisors are spending taxpayer dollars galore to fight back, and the Bar has unlimited resources, having just increased membership dues for attorneys, no doubt as a result of this expensive disciplinary case and show trial. The expensive Bar prosecutor they brought in from out of state reputedly has ties to the Mafia and doesn’t even have a law degree. The story is that he was put in that position in order to protect powerful homebuilder and real estate interests in Colorado and Arizona, and since Thomas tried to prosecute county supervisor Stapley’s former business partner Wolfswinkel, a convicted felon….
In contrast, her former supervisor, who was not targeted by the Bar, finally had the Bar conduct disciplinary proceedings against him when the Bar realized it would have egg on its face for not going after him too. He entered into a settlement agreement, admitting to have willfully committed ethical violations, and was only sentenced to probation, allowed to continue working at his job with the county. Amazingly, the county picked up the entire tab for his prosecution! Rachel was never found to have “willfully” done anything unethical, yet the county will not pay for the cost of prosecuting her. Rachel counted 13 times he lied – perjury – during the trial against her.
Rachel believes she was also targeted by a powerful left-wing attorney who sits on the Bar’s Board of Governors and was Bar president at the time the complaint started against her, Ed Novak. The article she wrote for Fox News destroyed work he had done defending a young man accused of downloading nine images of child porn. In her article, Alexander explained how there was no way a virus could have downloaded the child porn, then burned it to a CD that was sitting on his shelf. The young man’s family hired a PR firm to put up a website defending him and attacking Andrew Thomas, and made an appearance on the TV show 20/20 to further attack Thomas. Five years later, the young man’s father filed a lengthy bar complaint against Rachel over the article, that was very well-written going over all the ethical rules. Rachel believes Novak ghostwrote it for him — can’t stop tormenting her years later.